The Hawaii Gaming Advocates, Inc. promotes gambling in Hawaii.
Its September, 1999 report describes a resolution asking the Hawaii legislature
"to consider legislation to tax and regulate recreational gaming as a means
to help revitalize the economy." That resolution was approved by
the Waikiki Neighborhood Board at its August meeting. The Advocates'
executive chairman stated that the resolution "will be circulated among
other neighborhood boards before the 2000 legislative session."
The Waikiki board was offered another resolution in October asking the
legislature to legalize parimutuel gambling on horse-racing. A related
resolution asked the legislature to condemn the Ala Wai golf course for
"use as a thoroughbred horse racing venue." Factual data provided
by members of the Hawai'i Coalition Against Legalized Gambling played a
major role in the area residents' vote defeating the board's motions.
Four days later, legalized gambling was the subject of a top-of-the-page
headline in a newspaper business section. According to a "Casino
King," "Gambling might help tourism." That was the view of the owner
of a very new and very big Las Vegas casino. Even stronger was his
contention that, "If the tourism industry wants to be competitive with
other destinations, they have to bring in gambling."
Indeed, commercial and state gambling proposals often have been discussed
by Hawaii legislators, about 250 bills in the past 20 years. Much
of the 1996 session of the state legislature involved the issue of gambling.
The central question was whether some form of gambling could prove beneficial
for Hawaii. Belief that the economy was stagnating or in recession
gave impetus to the discussions.
Despite opinion polls showing only 32% in favor and 58% opposed to legalized
gambling, the 1996 House of Representatives debated the merits of a state
lottery. The Senate actually passed a bill to permit shipboard gambling.
A public referendum on gambling received much attention. By the end
of the session, however, no decision had been taken.
During that session, gambling received much attention in the media.
In the Focus section of the Honolulu Advertiser on February 11, 1996, a
former editor examined the many negatives resulting from gambling in other
areas. A very favorable view was offered in a report by a former Honolulu
resident working as a black-jack dealer near Reno, Nevada.
Although legal and illegal gambling are hardly new in the United States,
legalized gambling has been spreading widely since the 1980s. In
1986 only Nevada and New Jersey had casinos. while about half of the states
now have them. State lotteries, bingo houses, and parimutuel betting
also have increased greatly in numbers.
The rapid spread of state lotteries and casinos throughout the nation
has stimulated numerous studies of the effects of gambling. Libraries
have long possessed numerous books containing advice for gambling.
Now, they are beginning to have books about its socially damaging consequences.
Less evident are numerous research investigations conducted by skilled
professionals. Only a small segment of such data can be presented
here.
Beginning in 1984, the Journal of Gambling Studies has been publishing
articles by psychologists, sociologists, historians, psychiatrists and
other knowledgeable personnel. An entire issue of the 1998 Annals
of the American Academy of Political and Social Science is devoted to reports
about gambling. Especially important is the June, 1999 National
Gambling Impact Study Commission Final Report (NGISC).
A June, 1999 report in The Economist revealed that in 1997 Americans
spent more on gambling than their combined spending on movie tickets, spectator
sports, recorded music, video games, and theme parks. In recent years,
gambling has been described as the fastest growing industry in the United
States. Ten states have commercial casinos, and 22 have casinos operated
by American Indian tribes. Lotteries are available in 37 states.
Still, 1999 has seen Alabama voters reject a lottery referendum while state
Supreme Courts have overturned gambling laws in California and South Carolina.
Since Hawaii is only one of two states which have not legalized some
form of gambling, it will continue to be a target for gambling entrepreneurs.
To some legislators and tourist businesses, gambling may seem like a possible
solution to a stagnant economy. Potentially large profits could
accrue to those who gain a gambling foothold in this virgin territory.
The most profitable of the gambling enterprises obviously are those
with the greatest odds against winning. In a 1997 book subtitled:
How Gambling ruins the economy and destroys lives," Jennifer Vogel contends
that the lottery has the worst pay-out--only about 65%. She estimates
that slot machines pay about 92% while blackjack pays about 98%.
Others have reported payouts in some locales as low as 40%.
Timothy O'Brien's 1998 book Bad Bet contended that "...86 percent of
the $586.5 billion wagered in 1996 was wagered in casinos, and about 50%
of the $47.6 billion lost by gamblers that year was lost in casinos."
A key question is: "Who will be the losers?"
Most gamblers will be losers. The infrequent big winners are publicized
widely while the vast number of losers remain anonymous. Virtually
ignored are the millions of Americans who become hooked on gambling.
Those persons who cannot quit gambling have been called compulsive, addicted,
or pathological gamblers.
According to a study conducted at the Harvard Medical School, addicted
gamblers in the United States increased from 1.1 million to 4.4 million
between 1976 to 1997. In the three-year period 1994 and 1997, the
number doubled from 2.2 to 4.4 million. This was a period of enormous
increase in gambling facilities.
Addicted gamblers have the most serious troubles: theft, arrests,
loss of jobs, bankruptcy, marital conflict, and suicide. Some of
these troubles are faced by problem gamblers who are far more numerous
than addicted gamblers. The Harvard study reported that the number
of problem gamblers rose from 4.9 million in 1976 to 11 million in 1997.
Altogether, addicted and problem gamblers rose to over 15 million in 1997.
Between 1991 and 1997, military personnel who have become addicted
to gambling increased by 66%. The military increase of problem gamblers
rose even more, by 108%--from 108,000 to 212,250. That is a much
higher proportion among the military than among the civilian population.
The Iowa Department of Human Services has reported an enormous rise
in adolescent gambling addiction since the state's legalization of casinos.
The Iowa claim also has been that adolescence is a period of great vulnerability
to this compulsion. A California medical school professor has reported
that teens are three times more likely to become pathological gamblers
than are adults.
Despite a Massachusetts state law prohibiting the purchase of lottery
tickets by those under age 18, a state survey found that 47% of seventh
grade children had previously bought lottery tickets. In Atlantic
City, 64% of the students of a high school had gambled at local casinos.
A 1995 series on gambling in Newsday reported that: "Lower-income communities
spend a larger share of their money on lotteries." Their data showed
that "Annual lottery spending per $10,000 of household income was eight
times higher in the lowest income areas than in the highest." That
poor people are drawn to gambling has been widely documented.
The 15 million addicted and problem gamblers in the United States include
the most vulnerable persons. Along with teenagers and the poor, part-time
workers, the elderly, the handicapped, and other troubled individuals are
most susceptible to the illusions of gambling. Habitual gambling
usually makes their lot in life even more precarious.
Each of those millions is a human tragedy: the schoolteacher-gambler
who committed suicide; the widow who lost her savings and her home;
the 39-year-old man whose credit-card debt drove him into bankruptcy; children
left in cars all night while parents gambled; the cafe owner whose
business near a new casino failed; the 79% of compulsive gamblers
who reported that they wish to die; and so many of the others.
According to O'Brien's Bad Bet, "in most markets the bulk of gambling
revenue, as much as 80 percent, comes from a small percentage of gamblers,
about 20 percent." Many of them are compulsive or problem gamblers.
O'Brien also notes that, like the tobacco industry, the gambling industry
was denying or ignoring the habituating nature of their business.
The rapid spread of lotteries, casinos, slot machines, and other gambling
attractions spreads the damage done to habitual gamblers outward to their
families and beyond. Some of the gambling damage to families is reported
in a brochure distributed by the Hawaii Family Forum. These included:
Harrison County, Miss. has averaged 500 more divorces per year since casinos
arrived; Central City, Colorado experienced a six-fold rise in child
protection cases the year after casinos arrived; an Illinois study
of compulsive gamblers reported 26% were divorced or separated as a result
of their gambling.
An obvious consequence of gambling losses is shown in a NGISC report
which revealed the rapid increase in the their financial troubles.
While 2-3% percent of those who sought credit counseling in the 1980s blamed
gambling for their troubles, little more than a decade later, about 15%
made that explanation.
Like other problems of personal debt, bankruptcy affects communities
as well as gamblers. Two of the best-known gambling communities have
far higher bankruptcy rates than the national average. Nevada's rate
is 50% higher and Atlantic City's rate is 70% higher than the national
average. Communities within 100 miles of gambling sites have bankruptcy
rates 35% to 70% higher than the national average.
According to Harvard Medical School data, legalized gambling is linked
to crime convictions. For the United States, such convictions increased
by 150,000 between 1994 and 1997. Approximately half of the new convicts
were pathological or problem gamblers. According to the NGISC, "about 23
percent of pathological gamblers have been imprisoned, and so had 13 percent
of the problem gamblers."
An economist of the University of Illinois reported that U.S. counties
with casinos averaged an 8 percent higher crime rate than counties without
casinos. Among the higher rates of major crimes reported in the casino-linked
counties were robbery, burglary, larceny, rape, and assault.
Owners of small business are among the losers to legalized gambling.
As more residents spend their time and lose their money on gambling, they
have less to spend on food, clothing, housing, medical care, and other
necessities for themselves, their spouses, and their children.
Lotteries are said to be the most habitual type of gambling. Lottery
tickets are widely available and many ticket buyers don't feel that they
are gambling. While buying groceries or gasoline, many buyers spend
regular amounts for lottery tickets each time. State lotteries have
described losses as a substitute for paying taxes.
Those who claim that lottery tax revenues would go to improve state
schools need to look at the facts. A report in the May, 1996
Money magazine has the facts: "The proportion of state spending dedicated
to education has remained relatively unchanged in the '90s--about 50% for
lottery states and 60% for nonlottery states--despite the growth in lottery
revenues." Not a good bet for school children.
Will legalized gambling lower taxes? Don't bet on that either.
The same article reported that: "although states with lotteries have
raked in more than $128 billion in ticket purchases over the past five
years, average per capita taxes in those states have increased 21.7%.
That tax growth rate is three times as high as in nonlottery states, where
annual per capita taxes have risen just 7.2% since 1990."
Las Vegas usually is deemed to be the number one gambling place in the
United States. According to a documented report by the Hawaii Coalition
Against Legalized Gambling, Las Vegas is also number one nationally in
suicides, women killed by men, gambling addictions, divorce, and high school
dropouts. It is number three in bankruptcies and abortions;
number four in rapes, out-of-wedlock births, and alcohol related deaths;
number five in crimes; number 6 in locked-up prisoners: number fifty in
voter participation. Should Las Vegas be a role model for Hawaii?
Nor should Minnesota which, in less than ten years of legalized gambling,
"created a broad new class of addicts, victims, and criminals whose activities
are devastating families and costing taxpayers and businesses millions
of dollars." That quotation was made by the Honolulu Advertiser in
March, 1997 from a report in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune.
In the spring 1995 issue of Illinois Business Review, a University of
Illinois economist wrote: "Because casinos have artificially high
profit margins, are often owned by out-of-area investors, and frequently
take dollars from the area's existing tourist base rather than attracting
new tourists, the effect of gambling in many cases is to diminish the economic
base and cost jobs."
Legalizing gambling will not solve the economic or other troubles of
Hawaii. It would be a major problem--indeed, an interwoven variety
of serious problems. The opposition of the Honolulu police department
is based on their awareness of the relationship of legal gambling to crime
rates. Churches and social agencies know that legalization of gambling
would increase the problems of individuals, families, and the community.
Their knowledge of the social costs of legalized gambling can prevent
it from happening in Hawaii--but only if residents keep tabs on legislators.
As one commission member of the NGISC concluded: "The gambling industry
pours vast sums into the campaign coffers of gambling-friendly politicians."
That's an obvious voter-alert warning.
Copyright December 9,1999 by Jerome G. Manis